پژوهش‌های میان رشته‌ای زبان و ادبیات فارسی

بررسی کاربرد استعاره جنگ در متون خبری داخلی و خارجی مربوط به بیماری کووید-19: براساس رویکرد معنی‌شناسی قالبی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار زبان و ادبیات فارسی مجتمع آموزش عالی سراوان، سراوان، ایران

2 فارغ التحصیل دکتری زبانشناسی، گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان

چکیده

چکیده
با توجه به شیوع بیماری کووید-19، متخصصان و سیاستمداران تلاش دارند تا هر چه بهتر مردم را با بحران پیش آمده در کشورشان و سرتاسر دنیا آشنا سازند. در این میان استفاده از استعاره "جنگ" بسیار به چشم می‌خورد. بنابراین، پژوهش حاضر قصد دارد که به بررسی استعاره "جنگ" در بیانیه‌ها و متون‌ خبری داخلی و خارجی مرتبط با بیماری کووید-19 براساس دیدگاه معنی‌شناسی قالبی بپردازد. روش مورد استفاده در این پژوهش به‌صورت توصیفی-تحلیلی است. به این منظور، با بهره‌گیری از بیانیه‌ها و متون خبری داخلی از اخبار 20:30 و خبرگزاری‌های برخط ایسنا و ایرنا، استعاره‌های مربوط به بیماری کووید-19 گردآوری گردیدند و همچنین بیانیه‌ها و متون خبری خارجی برگرفته از روزنامه‌های گاردین، نیویورک تایمز و توئیتر جمع‌آوری شدند. تعداد 500 استعاره‌ در این متون از طریق الگوی پیشنهادی پراگلجاز به نام "روال تشخیص استعاره" استخراج شدند. سپس، استعاره‌ها در قالب معنایی «بیماری» قرار گرفتند و اجزاء قالب آنها مشخص شد. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان دادند که براساس نظریه معنی‌شناسی قالب‌بنیاد، برای ساخت استعاره‌ اجزاء هسته‌ و غیرهسته‌ قالب فعال می‌شوند و نقش معنایی ملموس‌تری به خود می‌گیرند. برای مثال، جزء هسته‌ بیمار در قالب معنایی «بیماری» وارد قالب «جنگ» می‌شود و نقش معنایی یکی از طرفین را به عنوان جزء هسته‌ این قالب ایفا می‌کند. از سوی دیگر، اجزاء هسته قالب از قبیل مورد و هدف و اجزاء غیرهسته شامل طول مدت، ابزار جنگ، روش جنگ، موقعیت جنگ، میزان جنگ، نتیجه جنگ، زمان و مکان جنگ نیز در قالب بیماری قرار گرفته‌اند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Study of Using War Metaphor in the Domestic and International News about Covid-19: Based on the Frame Semantics

نویسندگان [English]

  • mansour nikpanah 1
  • Mansoureh Delaramifar 2

1 Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Saravan Higher Education Complex. Saravan. Iran.

2 PhD in Linguistics, Department of English Language and Literature, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Abstract
According to the outbreak of Covid-19, experts and politicians are working to inform people completely about the crisis in their country and around the world. In the meantime, the use of the metaphor of "war" as a linguistic instrument is very common. Therefore, the present study examines the metaphor of "war" in the domestic and international news statements and texts related to the Covid-19 disease based on The Frame Semantics theory. This research is a descriptive- analytic research. To this end, the metaphors of the domestic news statements related to COVID-19 were selected from 20:30 news and online news, ISNA and IRNA, and the metaphors of the international statements related to COVID-19 were gathered from Guardian news, New York Times news and the website of Twitter. 500 metaphors in these texts were extracted through “Metaphor Identification Procedure” pattern suggested by Pragglejaz. Then, the metaphors located in the “disease” semantic frame and their frame elements were identified. The findings demonstrated that to create metaphors, the core and non-core elements of the frame play a more tangible semantic role. For example, the core element patient in the “disease” frame enters the "war" frame and plays the semantic role of one of the parties as the core element. On the other hand, the core elements of the frame such as case and purpose and non-core elements including duration, tools, method, position, size, result, time and place of war can get a role in the frame of disease.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Covid-19
  • Metaphor
  • Frame Semantics
  • Frame Elements
  • Cognitive semantics
  1. Introduction

Due to the spread of the Covid-19 disease (Covid-19), experts and politicians were trying to inform people about the crisis in their country and around the world. Meanwhile, the use of the "war" metaphor in the news was very visible. Therefore, the research decided to investigate the metaphor of "war" in domestic and foreign news statements and texts related to the Covid-19 disease, based on the perspective of Frame Semantics. Before this, the critical conditions of the society were showed by the use of the metaphor of "war". For example: In 1971, in a conference, the US president declared a civil war against drug. Richard Nixon, the president of the United States at the time, introduced drug addiction as the first enemy of the American people and announced that serious and aggressive action must be taken to fight and defeat this enemy.

As for the main goal of the current research, investigating the semantic frames and their elements in metaphor, the authors intend to discuss and analyse the concrete concepts that are used to express abstract concepts in the critical conditions of the Covid-19 disease in the world. Since, many researches have been conducted in the field of studying the semantic frames of lexical categories such as "noun", "verb" and "adjective" and none of them have investigated metaphor based on the theory of "Frame Semantics" and also, due to the importance of the spread of the virus Covid-19 all over the world and the concentration of the news on this matter, the current research aims to answer the following questions:

  1. Is it possible to find any connections between the semantic frame of “war” and “disease”?
  2. Can the element specifications of the semantic frames of “war” and “disease” be the reason for using the metaphor “war” universally to refer to the disease of Covid-19?
  3. Methodology

The research method is descriptive-analytical. For this purpose, metaphors related to the disease of Covid-19 were collected from the domestic news statements and texts ("20:30" news) and online news agencies ("ISNA" and "IRNA"), as well as foreign news statements and texts taken from The Guardian, New York Times and Twitter. Five hundred metaphors in these texts were extracted through the model proposed by Pragglejaz called "Metaphor Recognition Procedure". Then, the metaphors were placed in the semantic form of "disease"; and their elements were determined.

  1. Discussion and results

The use of the "war" metaphor requires the use of the core elements of the "war" frame such as "warring parties", "case" and "target", and non-core elements including "duration", "war", "tool", "war", " method", "war", "position of war", "scale of war", "result of war", "time and place of war". The findings obtained from news texts showed that in addition to the semantic frame, its elements can also play an important role in the construction of metaphor; Therefore, the findings are a proof that the metaphor, with the aim of putting the whole semantic frame, leads the mind of the audience to understand the disease and the resulting crisis. For example, "disease" is conceptualized in the mind as "war", which is a kind of experience of the external and objective world, and the risk of contact is highlighted for the audience. During such a goal, people try to apply their political goals to the people. In some cases, it was observed that politicians link their failure in running the affairs of the country to the Covid-19 disease crisis, and by referring to the metaphor of "war", they try to consider the situation of the country as a war condition, and in this way, the burden of their managerial failure place on the situation. For example, Trump has presented himself as a wartime president. The use of the metaphor of war in such a place can also indicate the social, political, economic and military crisis in America.

 

 

  1. Conclusion

The findings of the research showed that based on the theory of " Frame Semantics", the core and non-core elements of the frames are activated and take on a more concrete semantic role for making metaphors. For example, the core elements of "patient" in the semantic form of "disease" enters the form of "war" and plays the semantic role of "one of the parties" as the core element of this frame. On the other hand, the core element of the frame such as "case" and "target", and non-core elements including "duration of war", "tools of war", "method of war", "situation of war", "scale of war", "result of war" ", "time and place of war" are also included in the frame of disease.

  1. Keywords: Metaphor, Frame Semantics, Frame Elements, Cognitive Semantics

  • منابع

    کتاب‌ها

    • انوری، حسن (1381). فرهنگ بزرگ سخن؛ تهران: انتشارات سخن.
    • صفوی، کوروش (1387). درآمدی بر معنی‌شناسی؛ تهران: سوره مهر.

    مقاله

    • افراشی، آزیتا؛ عاصی، محمد و جولایی، کامیار (1394). «استعاره‌های مفهومی در زبان فارسی؛ تحلیلی شناختی و پیکره‌مدار»؛ زبانشناخت، سال6، شمارۀ2، 39-61.
    • حسابی، اکبر (1395). «قالب‌های معنایی خوردن از منظر معناشناسی قالبی»؛ مجله زبان و زبان‌شناسی، دورۀ11، شمارۀ22، 1-26.
    • دلارامی‌فر، منصوره. یوسفیان، پاکزاد. اله‌بخش، محمد. و عباسعلی آهنگر (1396). «روابط معنایی فعل گرفتن در زبان فارسی: رویکرد معنی‌شناسی قالب‌بنیاد فیلمور (1997)»؛ پژوهش‌های زبانی، دورۀ8، شمارۀ1، 79-98.
    • روحی، مهری؛ روشن، بلقیس؛ و راسخ مهند، محمد (1397). «بررسی استعاره‌های خشم در زبان‌های فارسی، کردی و گیلکی در چهارچوب شناختی»؛ زباى فارسی و گویش‌های ایرانی، سال3، دورۀ1، 31-56.
    • زاهدی، کیوان و دریکوند، عصمت (1390). «استعاره‌های شناختی در نثر فارسی و انگلیسی»؛ نقد زبان و ادبیات خارجی، دورۀ3، شمارۀ6، 1-19
    • علی‌پور، ساناز؛ شریفی، شهلا؛ و ایزانلو، علی (1395). «معرفی ام. آی. پی: روشی برای شناسایی استعاره در گفتمان»، مجلة زبانشناسی و گویش‌های خراسان، شمارة پیاپی14، 111-139.
    • عموزاده، محمد؛ کریمی دوستان، غلامحسین؛ و شریف، بابک (1395). «شبکه معنایی فعل گرفتن بر اساس انگاره چندمعنایی اصول‌مند»؛ پژوهش‌های زبانی، شمارۀ1، 117-136.
    • کلانتری، عزت الله؛ محمدنیا، مهدی؛ و اکبری‌زاده، مسعود (1400). «بررسی استعاره‌های مفهومی خشم در قرآن کریم بر اساس دو نظریۀ عصب - زیستی و کنش مفهومی»؛ علم زبان، دوره 13، شماره 38، 35-64.
    • فرنوش، غلامرضا؛ علیشیری، غلامحسین؛ حسینی ذیجود، سید رضا؛ درستکار، روح‌اله؛ و جلالی فراهانی، علیرضا (1399). «شناخت کروناویروس نوین- 2111 و کووید- 11 بر اساس شواهد موجود- مطالعه مروری»؛ مجلۀ طب نظامی، دورۀ22، شمارۀ1، 1-11
    • موسوی، حمزه؛ عموزاده، محمد؛ و رضایی، والی (1394). «بررسی واژه دیدن بر اساس معنی‌شناسی قالبی»؛ جستارهای زبانی، دورۀ6، شمارۀ7، 219-236.
    • نائب‌لویی، فاطمه؛ عاصی، سیدمصطفی؛ و افراشی، آزیتا (1394). «شبکۀ معنایی قالب‌بنیاد در زبان فارسی»، پژوهش‌های زبانشناسی تطبیقی، دورۀ5، شمارۀ9، 261-282.
    • نامور، زهرا؛ و امیری پریان، خدیجه (1396). «کاربرد استعاره‌های مفهومی در تیترهای خبری 20:30 در شبکه دو سیما، مطالعه‌ای در چارچوب معنی‌شناسی شناختی»، پژوهش‌های ارتباطی، شمارۀ1، پیاپی89، 149-179.
    • نیک پناه, منصور, دلارامی فر, منصوره. (1401). «بررسی مقایسه‌ای استعاره‌های پرکاربرد در متون خبری مربوط به بیماری کووید-19 در آغاز شیوع بیماری و اوج‌گیری آن در مهرماه: براساس دیدگاه معنی‌شناسی قالبی»؛ مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی, 13(27), 323-352.

    منابع لاتین

    • کتاب
    • Baker, C. F .(1999). Seeing clearly: Frame semantic, psycholinguistic, and cross-linguistic approaches to the semantics of the English verb PhD. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1999.
    • Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Inversion and constructional inheritance. Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation (Studies in constraint-based lexicalism 1). ed. by Gert Webelhuth, Jean-Pierre Koenig, and Andreas Kathol, 113–28. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    • Filmore, C.J. & Baker, C.F. (2009). A Frame Approach to Semantics Analysis. Oxford handbook of linguistics analysis, Oxford UN. Press.
    • Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction, Oxford University Press.
    • Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Petruck, M. (1996). Frame Semantics, Östman J-O, J. Blommaert, C. Bulcaen (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 1-13.
    • Petruck, M. (2013). Advances in Frame Semantics. Advances in Frame Semantics, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 1-12.
    • Filmore, C.J., Baker, C.F. & Low, J. (1997). The Berkeley Framenet Project. International Computer Science Institute. Berkeley, California.

      Article

    • Bates, B. R. (2020). “The (In) Appropriateness of the WAR Metaphor in Response to SARS-CoV-2: A Rapid Analysis of Donald J. Trump’s Rhetoric”. Front. Commun. 5
    • Bennett, B., and Berenson, T. (2020). “’Our big war.’ As coronavirus spreads, Trump refashions himself as a wartime president”. Times.
    • Balteiro, I. (2017). “Metaphor in Ebola’s popularized scientific discourse”. Iberico. 34: 209-230.
    • Boas, H. C. (2010). “The syntax–lexicon continuum in Construction Grammar: A case study of English communication verbs”. Belgian journal of linguistics, 24 (1), 54-82.
    • Bouveret, M., & Sweetser, E. (2009). “Multi-frame semantics, metaphoric extensions and grammar”. In Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 35 (1), 49-59.
    • Delaramifar, M., Yousefian, P., Allahbakhsh, M., Ahangar, A. A. (2017). “Semantics Relations of Persian Verb "gereftan": Fillmore's Frame Semantic (1997)”. Journal of Language Research. 8 (1), 79-98 [In Persian].
    • Fillmore, C. J. (1976). “Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Science”. Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech. 280, 20–32.
    • Fillmore, C. J. (1977). “Topic in Lexical Semantics. Current Issue in Linguistic Theory”. Bloomington. Indiana University Press.
    • Fillmore, C. J. (1982). “Frame semantics”. The Linguistic Society of Korea. Linguistics in the Morning Calm,111-37.
    • Fillmore, C. J. a & Atkins, B. (1992). “Towards a Frame-based Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and its Neighbors, in Frames, Fields and Contrasts”. Semantic and Lexical Organization. A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (eds.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, New Jersey. 75-102.
    • Fillmore, C. J., Baker C. F. & Ruppenhofer, J. (2002). The FrameNet Database and Software Tools. International Computer Science Institute. Berkeley, Califirnia, 94704-94747.
    • Filmore, C.J., Ruppenhofer, J. & Baker, C. F. (2004). “FrameNet and representing the link between semantic and syntactic relations”. Frontiers in linguistics, 1, 19-59.
    • Lakoff, G. (1991): “Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf”. Peace Research, 25-32.
    • Li, X., & Mooi C. C. (2017). SBGAR: Semantics Based Group Activity recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision.34-42.
    • Mogensen, M. S. (2008). “From Cartoon Crisis to Heads carf Row”. Two Conflicts Retrieved from http://www. intercultural. dk/images/stories/forside/cartooncrisisexerpt. pdf.
    • Moore, K. E. (2011). “Frames and the experiential basis of the Moving Time metaphor”. Constructions and Frames, 3(1), 80-103.
    • Pommerville, J. C. (2010). “Alcamo's Fundamentals of Microbiology”. Sudbury, Jones & Bartlett. 323.
    • Pragglejaz Group. (2007). “A Method of Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse”. Methaphor and symbol. Lawrensce Erlbaum Associates, 22 (1), 1-39.
    • Remarks (2020f, 18 March). Remarks by president Trump, vice president pence, and members of the coronavirus task force in press briefing.
    • Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruk, M. & Scheffczyk, J. (2016). FrameNetII: Extended Theory and Practice, International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, California.
    • Skorczynska, H. (2014). “Metaphor and education: Reaching business training goals through multimodal metaphor”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 116, 2344-2351.
    • Smith, D. (2020, 22 March). “Trump talks himself up as ’wartime president’ to lead America through a crisis. The Guardian”. Available online at: https:// www.theguardian.com/us news/2020/mar/22/trump-coronavirus-electionnovember- 2020.
    • Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). “Corpus-based approached to metaphor and metonymy”, In A. Stefanowitch and S. T. Gries (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (1-16), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    • Sullivan, K., & Sweetser, E. (2009). Is' Generic Specific'a Metaphor?. Meaning, form and body. Routledge, 309-327.
    • Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2001). “Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: the case of over”. Language. 77 (4): 724–65.

    Refrences

    • Afrashi, A, Asi, S. M, Juolaei, K. (2016). “Conceptual metaphors in Persian: A cognitive perspective and a corpus driven Analysis”. Linguistics, 6(12), Winter and Spring, 39-61 [In Persian].
    • Alipour, s., Sharifi, S.., Izanloo, A. (2016). “Introducing MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphors in Discourse”. Journal of Linguistics and Khorasan Dialects, 8 (14), 111-139 [In Persian].
    • Amozadeh, M., Karimi Dustan, Gh., Sharif, B. (2016). “The Semantic Network of “Gereftan” in Persian Based on Principled Polysemy Model”. Journal of Language Researches. 7 (1), 117-136 [In Persian].
    • Anvari, H. (2002). Sokhan Dictionary. Tehran: Sokhan [In Persian].
    • Baker, C. F (1999).Seeing clearly: Frame semantic, psycholinguistic, and cross-linguistic approaches to the semantics of the English verb see. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
    • Bates, B. R. (2020). “The (In) Appropriateness of the WAR Metaphor in Response to SARS-CoV-2: A Rapid Analysis of Donald J. Trump’s Rhetoric”. Front. Commun. 5
    • Bennett, B., and Berenson, T. (2020). “’Our big war.’ As coronavirus spreads, Trump refashions himself as a wartime president”. Times.
    • Balteiro, I. (2017). “Metaphor in Ebola’s popularized scientific discourse”. Iberico. 34: 209-230.
    • Boas, H. C. (2010). “The syntax–lexicon continuum in Construction Grammar: A case study of English communication verbs”. Belgian journal of linguistics, 24 (1), 54-82.
    • Bouveret, M., & Sweetser, E. (2009). “Multi-frame semantics, metaphoric extensions and grammar”. In Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 35 (1), 49-59.
    • Farnoosh, Gh., Alishiri, Gh., Hosseini, S. R., Dorostkar, R., Jalali Farahani, A. (2020). “Understanding the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Based on Available Evidence” - A Narrative Review. Journal of Military Medicine, 22 (1), 1-11 [In Persian].
    • Delaramifar, M., Yousefian, P., Allahbakhsh, M., Ahangar, A. A. (2017). “Semantics Relations of Persian Verb "gereftan": Fillmore's Frame Semantic (1997)”. Journal of Language Research. 8 (1), 79-98 [In Persian].
    • Fillmore, C. J. (1976). “Frame semantics and the nature of language”. Annals of the New York Academy of Science. Conference on the Origin and Development of Language and Speech. 280, 20–32.
    • Fillmore, C. J. (1992). “Towards a Frame-based Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and its Neighbors, in Frames, Fields and Contrasts”. Semantic and Lexical Organization. A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, New Jersey, 75-102.
    • Fillmore, C.J., Ruppenhofer, J. & Baker, C. F. (2004). “FrameNet and representing the link between semantic and syntactic relations”. Frontiers in linguistics, 1,19-59
    • Fillmore, C.J. & Baker, C.F. (2009). A Frame Approach to Semantics Analysis. Oxford handbook of linguistics analysis, Oxford UN. Press.
    • Hesabi, A. ( 2016). “The Verb “xordan” from the Perspective of Cognitive Linguistics”. Language and Linguistics, 11(22), 1-26 [In Persian].
    • Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.
    • Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Lakoff, G. (1991): “Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf”. Peace Research, 25-32.
    • Li, X., & Mooi C. C. (2017). “SBGAR: Semantics Based Group Activity recognition”. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2876-2885.
    • Mogensen, M. S. (2008). “From Cartoon Crisis to Headscarf Row. Two Conflicts Changing Multireligious Denmark”. Retrieved from:http://www.intercultural.dk/images/stories/forside/cartooncrisisexerpt.pdf.
    • Moore, K. E. (2011). “Frames and the experiential basis of the Moving Time metaphor”. Constructions and Frames. 3(1), 80-103.
    • Mousavi S H, Amoozadeh M, Rezai V. (2016). “Analysis of the Word ‘Didan’ Based on Frame Semantics”. LRR. 6 (7), 219-236 [In Persian].
    • Namvar, Z., Amiri Parian, Kh. (2016). “Using Conceptual Metaphor in the Headlines of 20:30 news”. Communication Researches, 6 (7), 219-236 [In Persian].
    • Nayeblui, F., Assi, M., Afrashi, A. (2015). “Persian FrameNet”. Iranian Journal of Comparative Linguistic Researches. 1 (89), 149-179 [In Persian].
    •   Nikpanah, Mansour. Delaramifar, Mansoureh. (2022). “A Comparative Study of the Most Commonly Used Metaphors in Covid-19 News Texts during the Outbreak and Peak of the Disease”. Journal of Linguistics and Rhetorical studies. 13(27), 323-352 [in Persian].
    • Petruck, M. (1996). “Frame Semantics. Handbook of Pragmatics”. Östman J-O, J. Blommaert, C. Bulcaen (eds.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 1-13.
    • Petruck, M. (2013). “Advances in Frame Semantics. Advances in Frame Semantics”. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins. 1-12.
    • Pommerville, J. C. (2010). “Alcamo's Fundamentals of Microbiology”. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett. 323.
    • Pragglejaz Group. (2007). “A Method of Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse. Methaphor and symbol”. Lawrensce Erlbaum Associates. 22 (1), 1-39.
    • Remarks (2020f, 18 March). “Remarks by president Trump, vice president pence, and members of the coronavirus task force in press briefing”.
    • Ruhi, M., Rovshan, B., Rasekh, M. (2018). “Metaphors of Anger in Persian, Kurdish, and Guilaki: A cognitive Linguistics Perspective”. Persian Language and Iranian Dialect, 3 (1), 31-56 [In Persian].
    • Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruk, M. & Scheffczyk, J. (2016). FrameNetII: Extended Theory and Practice. International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, California.
    • Safavi, K. (2004). “An Introduction to Semantics”. Tehran” Institute for Islamic Culture and Art [In Persian].
    • Skorczynska, H. (2014). “Metaphor and education: Reaching business training goals through multimodal metaphor”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 116, 2344-2351.
    • Smith, D. (2020, 22 March). “Trump talks himself up as ’wartime president’ to lead America through a crisis. The Guardian”. Available online at: https:// www.theguardian.com/us news/2020/mar/22/trump-coronavirus-electionnovember- 2020.
    • Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). “Corpus-based ap proached to metaphor and metonymy”. A. Sullivan, K. (2006). Frame-based constraints on lexical choice in metaphor. In Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 32 (1), 387-399.
    • Sullivan, K., & Sweetser, E. (2009). “Is ' Generic Specific' a Metaphor?. Meaning, Form and Body”. Language. 309-327.
    • Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2001). “Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: the case of over”. Language. 77 (4), 724–65.
    • Zahedi, K., Darikvand, E. (2011). “Conceptual Metaphors in Persian and English”. Critical Languages and Literary Studies, 3(2), 1-19 [In Persian].
پژوهش‌های میان رشته‌ای زبان و ادبیات فارسی
دوره 1، شماره 2
دو فصلنامه (شماره پاییز و زمستان 1401)
مهر 1401
صفحه 39-64
  • تاریخ دریافت: 23 مهر 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 06 شهریور 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 11 اسفند 1401